<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1444 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305247</link>
    <description>A liquidation e-auction for sale of a corporate debtor as a going concern was found to be unfair where the corrigendum extended bidding timelines without preserving a realistic opportunity for site inspection and due diligence. The liquidator&#039;s failure to take proper account of relevant considerations, including the successful bidder&#039;s suitability to run the business as a going concern, was held unreasonable. As the process did not support value maximization and denied intending bidders a fair chance to assess the assets, the concluded auction and letter of intent were set aside and a fresh auction was directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2022 21:56:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1444 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305247</link>
      <description>A liquidation e-auction for sale of a corporate debtor as a going concern was found to be unfair where the corrigendum extended bidding timelines without preserving a realistic opportunity for site inspection and due diligence. The liquidator&#039;s failure to take proper account of relevant considerations, including the successful bidder&#039;s suitability to run the business as a going concern, was held unreasonable. As the process did not support value maximization and denied intending bidders a fair chance to assess the assets, the concluded auction and letter of intent were set aside and a fresh auction was directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>