<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Confiscation of Gold Bars Overturned Due to Insufficient Proof u/s 123; Burden of Proof Not Shifted.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66714</link>
    <description>Confiscation - Smuggling - Gold Bars - town seizure - the burden of proof under Section 123 of the Act is not shifted on the appellant. Revenue has not been able to establish the smuggled nature of gold in question. In this view of the matter, the impugned order is set aside - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2022 14:18:01 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2022 14:18:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Confiscation of Gold Bars Overturned Due to Insufficient Proof u/s 123; Burden of Proof Not Shifted.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66714</link>
      <description>Confiscation - Smuggling - Gold Bars - town seizure - the burden of proof under Section 123 of the Act is not shifted on the appellant. Revenue has not been able to establish the smuggled nature of gold in question. In this view of the matter, the impugned order is set aside - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2022 14:18:01 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66714</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>