<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1030 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430606</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the classification of income from the sale of land as business income and upholding the disallowance of cash payments under section 40A(3). The Tribunal found that the land was non-agricultural at the time of sale and that the transaction was considered an adventure in the nature of trade, leading to the income being classified as business income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2022 10:38:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1030 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430606</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the classification of income from the sale of land as business income and upholding the disallowance of cash payments under section 40A(3). The Tribunal found that the land was non-agricultural at the time of sale and that the transaction was considered an adventure in the nature of trade, leading to the income being classified as business income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430606</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>