https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430601 The Court set aside the impugned order and notice for the Assessment Year 2016-17, directing the petitioner, an advocate, to file a supplementary reply within four weeks. The Assessing Officer was instructed to issue a fresh order within eight weeks, emphasizing that the decision did not address the merits of the case. The Court allowed the petitioner to submit responses via email or hard copy due to proceedings being linked to a deactivated PAN, maintaining neutrality on the underlying dispute. en-us Thu, 10 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:32:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430601 The Court set aside the impugned order and notice for the Assessment Year 2016-17, directing the petitioner, an advocate, to file a supplementary reply within four weeks. The Assessing Officer was instructed to issue a fresh order within eight weeks, emphasizing that the decision did not address the merits of the case. The Court allowed the petitioner to submit responses via email or hard copy due to proceedings being linked to a deactivated PAN, maintaining neutrality on the underlying dispute. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 10 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430601