<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Authorities Urged to Examine Work Orders for Accurate Classification u/r 2A(ii)A, Potential 40% Service Tax Rate.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66712</link>
    <description>Classification of Works Contract service -original work - Had the authorities below gone through each and every work order and the annexure mentioning the scope of work of that work order then perhaps they might have also come to the same conclusion that more or less the entire works in issue falls under Rule 2A(ii)A ibid which require service tax @ 40%. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:31:13 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:31:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Authorities Urged to Examine Work Orders for Accurate Classification u/r 2A(ii)A, Potential 40% Service Tax Rate.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66712</link>
      <description>Classification of Works Contract service -original work - Had the authorities below gone through each and every work order and the annexure mentioning the scope of work of that work order then perhaps they might have also come to the same conclusion that more or less the entire works in issue falls under Rule 2A(ii)A ibid which require service tax @ 40%. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:31:13 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66712</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>