<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 116 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31004</link>
    <description>CESTAT New Delhi held that the appellant had not established a prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit under section 35F. Applying the marketability test, the order noted that actual sale is not necessary and that marketability does not depend on the number of buyers. Although the pre-cast structural components and girders were tailor-made for the DMRC project, the tribunal treated DMRC as the obvious buyer and considered the goods prima facie marketable excisable goods under Chapter sub-heading 6810 91 00. Partial waiver was therefore granted only on condition of a deposit of Rs. 55,00,000, with recovery of the balance stayed on compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 22:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 116 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31004</link>
      <description>CESTAT New Delhi held that the appellant had not established a prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit under section 35F. Applying the marketability test, the order noted that actual sale is not necessary and that marketability does not depend on the number of buyers. Although the pre-cast structural components and girders were tailor-made for the DMRC project, the tribunal treated DMRC as the obvious buyer and considered the goods prima facie marketable excisable goods under Chapter sub-heading 6810 91 00. Partial waiver was therefore granted only on condition of a deposit of Rs. 55,00,000, with recovery of the balance stayed on compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>