https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305218 The court found that the learned Single Judge's order staying the Adjudicating Authority's order was inappropriate due to the availability of alternative remedies under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988. The court emphasized the importance of exhausting these remedies before seeking extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Consequently, the court stayed the Single Judge's order and disposed of the civil applications for stay, rejecting the respondents' request to continue relief to approach the Supreme Court. en-us Tue, 02 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Nov 2022 22:48:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305218 The court found that the learned Single Judge's order staying the Adjudicating Authority's order was inappropriate due to the availability of alternative remedies under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988. The court emphasized the importance of exhausting these remedies before seeking extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Consequently, the court stayed the Single Judge's order and disposed of the civil applications for stay, rejecting the respondents' request to continue relief to approach the Supreme Court. Case-Laws Benami Property Tue, 02 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305218