https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305216 A revocation of forest clearance was held unsustainable where mining had already commenced pursuant to the approval and the withdrawal was made without notice, hearing or recorded reasons. The article states that once such an approval had created a substantive right, it could not be withdrawn mechanically on the basis of a State communication alone; a speaking order was required. It also notes that violation of natural justice and absence of reasons justified writ jurisdiction, so the availability of an alternative remedy did not bar the petition. The revocation was therefore set aside. en-us Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Nov 2022 22:48:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305216 A revocation of forest clearance was held unsustainable where mining had already commenced pursuant to the approval and the withdrawal was made without notice, hearing or recorded reasons. The article states that once such an approval had created a substantive right, it could not be withdrawn mechanically on the basis of a State communication alone; a speaking order was required. It also notes that violation of natural justice and absence of reasons justified writ jurisdiction, so the availability of an alternative remedy did not bar the petition. The revocation was therefore set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305216