https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305216 The court found the revocation of the forest clearance order invalid due to non-compliance with principles of natural justice. The petitioner's substantive right accrued upon approval in 2011, necessitating adherence to natural justice before revocation. The court emphasized the importance of providing reasons in administrative decisions for fairness. Despite the availability of an alternative remedy, the court entertained the writ petition and quashed the revocation order, citing the violation of natural justice and lack of reasons in the impugned order. en-us Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Nov 2022 22:48:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305216 The court found the revocation of the forest clearance order invalid due to non-compliance with principles of natural justice. The petitioner's substantive right accrued upon approval in 2011, necessitating adherence to natural justice before revocation. The court emphasized the importance of providing reasons in administrative decisions for fairness. Despite the availability of an alternative remedy, the court entertained the writ petition and quashed the revocation order, citing the violation of natural justice and lack of reasons in the impugned order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305216