<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 115 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31002</link>
    <description>Where a duty demand covered multiple clearances, the appellate forum treated the liability holistically rather than splitting the consignments artificially, and allowed adjustment of duty already paid on the returned goods against the demand. On the appellant&#039;s own calculation, the duty payable under the relevant invoice was lower than the amount already paid, so the demand was reduced. On penalty, the assessee had sought permission from the jurisdictional authority before clearance and the delay in response came from the department, so a lenient approach was warranted and the penalty was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 115 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31002</link>
      <description>Where a duty demand covered multiple clearances, the appellate forum treated the liability holistically rather than splitting the consignments artificially, and allowed adjustment of duty already paid on the returned goods against the demand. On the appellant&#039;s own calculation, the duty payable under the relevant invoice was lower than the amount already paid, so the demand was reduced. On penalty, the assessee had sought permission from the jurisdictional authority before clearance and the delay in response came from the department, so a lenient approach was warranted and the penalty was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>