https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305210 The High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging the rejection of an application under Order 19 Rule 2 C.P.C. by the lower court. The court emphasized the limited scope of revision petitions under Section 115 C.P.C. and the necessity for justifying requests for cross-examination. It highlighted the conditions for exercising judicial discretion under Order 19 Rule 2 C.P.C., emphasizing the need for a bonafide application supported by cogent reasons. The court concluded that the lower court had jurisdiction to decide on granting permission for cross-examination and dismissed the revision petition based on established legal principles and lack of irreparable injury. en-us Wed, 19 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Nov 2022 17:44:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305210 The High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging the rejection of an application under Order 19 Rule 2 C.P.C. by the lower court. The court emphasized the limited scope of revision petitions under Section 115 C.P.C. and the necessity for justifying requests for cross-examination. It highlighted the conditions for exercising judicial discretion under Order 19 Rule 2 C.P.C., emphasizing the need for a bonafide application supported by cogent reasons. The court concluded that the lower court had jurisdiction to decide on granting permission for cross-examination and dismissed the revision petition based on established legal principles and lack of irreparable injury. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305210