https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305210 Interference under Section 115 CPC is limited to jurisdictional error, material irregularity, failure of justice, or irreparable injury, and will not be made against an interlocutory order passed within jurisdiction. Permission to summon a deponent for cross-examination under Order 19 Rule 2 CPC is not automatic; it must rest on bona fide grounds and a demonstrated need in the interests of justice. As no material irregularity was shown in the subordinate court's refusal and no irreparable injury was established, revisional interference was declined and the refusal to permit cross-examination was upheld. en-us Wed, 19 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Nov 2022 17:44:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305210 Interference under Section 115 CPC is limited to jurisdictional error, material irregularity, failure of justice, or irreparable injury, and will not be made against an interlocutory order passed within jurisdiction. Permission to summon a deponent for cross-examination under Order 19 Rule 2 CPC is not automatic; it must rest on bona fide grounds and a demonstrated need in the interests of justice. As no material irregularity was shown in the subordinate court's refusal and no irreparable injury was established, revisional interference was declined and the refusal to permit cross-examination was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305210