<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Challenge to Section 263 Revision: Properties Owned by Partnership, Not Individual; No Revenue Loss to Assessee.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66698</link>
    <description>Revision u/s 263 - Since the two properties referred by Ld. PCIT belonged to the partnership firm, the profit on sale of those properties cannot be assessed in the hands of the assessee. When there is no revenue leakage in the hands of the assessee, the impugned assessment order cannot be termed as erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue in respect of this issue. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 16:36:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 16:36:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Challenge to Section 263 Revision: Properties Owned by Partnership, Not Individual; No Revenue Loss to Assessee.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66698</link>
      <description>Revision u/s 263 - Since the two properties referred by Ld. PCIT belonged to the partnership firm, the profit on sale of those properties cannot be assessed in the hands of the assessee. When there is no revenue leakage in the hands of the assessee, the impugned assessment order cannot be termed as erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue in respect of this issue. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 16:36:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>