<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Upholds Creditor Classification in Insolvency Case: Farmers Get Full Dues, Appellant Receives 1.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66686</link>
    <description>Approval of the Resolution Plan - discriminatory plan - Farmers were given 100% of the dues whereas the Appellant has given only 1% of the dues - there is no embargo for the classification of the ‘Operational Creditors’ into separate/different classes for deciding the way in which the money is to be distributed to them by the CoCs. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 14:57:49 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 14:57:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Upholds Creditor Classification in Insolvency Case: Farmers Get Full Dues, Appellant Receives 1.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66686</link>
      <description>Approval of the Resolution Plan - discriminatory plan - Farmers were given 100% of the dues whereas the Appellant has given only 1% of the dues - there is no embargo for the classification of the ‘Operational Creditors’ into separate/different classes for deciding the way in which the money is to be distributed to them by the CoCs. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 14:57:49 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66686</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>