https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305208 The court rejected the bail application of the petitioner in an N.D.P.S. case, emphasizing the legality of the arrest and custody, distinguishing between the two terms. It dismissed arguments of illegal detention, upheld the confession statement's admissibility, and highlighted the offense's seriousness. Discrepancies in timing and panchnama recording were considered premature for bail proceedings. Due to the gravity of the offense and restricted bail provisions under the N.D.P.S. Act, the court denied bail and ordered expedited trial proceedings given the petitioner's custody status. en-us Thu, 15 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Nov 2022 14:30:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305208 The court rejected the bail application of the petitioner in an N.D.P.S. case, emphasizing the legality of the arrest and custody, distinguishing between the two terms. It dismissed arguments of illegal detention, upheld the confession statement's admissibility, and highlighted the offense's seriousness. Discrepancies in timing and panchnama recording were considered premature for bail proceedings. Due to the gravity of the offense and restricted bail provisions under the N.D.P.S. Act, the court denied bail and ordered expedited trial proceedings given the petitioner's custody status. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 15 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305208