https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305206 The Bombay High Court Division Bench dismissed petitions challenging permissions granted for a joint development project, citing substantial progress in the project and the interests of occupants awaiting completion. The Supreme Court upheld this decision, noting the project's advancement, majority occupant consent, increased amenities, and lack of justification to interfere based on a few objecting occupants. The Court emphasized honoring majority consents and dismissed the petition, finding no need for writ jurisdiction under Article 226. Chamber Summons 132 of 2011 was disposed of following the petition's dismissal. en-us Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Nov 2022 14:03:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305206 The Bombay High Court Division Bench dismissed petitions challenging permissions granted for a joint development project, citing substantial progress in the project and the interests of occupants awaiting completion. The Supreme Court upheld this decision, noting the project's advancement, majority occupant consent, increased amenities, and lack of justification to interfere based on a few objecting occupants. The Court emphasized honoring majority consents and dismissed the petition, finding no need for writ jurisdiction under Article 226. Chamber Summons 132 of 2011 was disposed of following the petition's dismissal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305206