<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty on Central Excise Challenged: Appellants Contest Duty Evasion Allegations and Penalty by Commissioner (Appeals) as Unwarranted.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66676</link>
    <description>Levy of penalty - The intimation was sent vide letter dated 31.12.2015 i.e. even prior the clearance of the goods. The question of evasion of duty does not at all arises that too with the malafide intent. Even penalty has wrongly been imposed by Commissioner (Appeals) on the appellants. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 12:05:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 12:05:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty on Central Excise Challenged: Appellants Contest Duty Evasion Allegations and Penalty by Commissioner (Appeals) as Unwarranted.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66676</link>
      <description>Levy of penalty - The intimation was sent vide letter dated 31.12.2015 i.e. even prior the clearance of the goods. The question of evasion of duty does not at all arises that too with the malafide intent. Even penalty has wrongly been imposed by Commissioner (Appeals) on the appellants. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 12:05:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66676</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>