https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305201 Under Section 7 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, revocation of registration requires issuance of a show-cause notice and consideration of the promoter's reply, but it does not mandate a personal or oral hearing unless the statute so provides. The High Court treated the power as administrative rather than quasi-judicial, so the Authority could authorise its Secretary to communicate the decision without unlawful sub-delegation. The revocation was sustained because the record showed incomplete disclosure, stalled construction, and diversion of funds, and the challenge to the procedure failed. en-us Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Nov 2022 11:20:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305201 Under Section 7 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, revocation of registration requires issuance of a show-cause notice and consideration of the promoter's reply, but it does not mandate a personal or oral hearing unless the statute so provides. The High Court treated the power as administrative rather than quasi-judicial, so the Authority could authorise its Secretary to communicate the decision without unlawful sub-delegation. The revocation was sustained because the record showed incomplete disclosure, stalled construction, and diversion of funds, and the challenge to the procedure failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305201