<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 114 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30997</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a security services provider, in a case involving a shortfall in service tax payment due to discrepancies in their returns. Despite penalties imposed under Sections 76 and 78 of the Act, the Tribunal invoked Section 80 to waive the penalties based on the appellant&#039;s genuine belief of non-liability for services to the Official Liquidator, prompt payment upon detection, and industry practices. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the penalties were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 114 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30997</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a security services provider, in a case involving a shortfall in service tax payment due to discrepancies in their returns. Despite penalties imposed under Sections 76 and 78 of the Act, the Tribunal invoked Section 80 to waive the penalties based on the appellant&#039;s genuine belief of non-liability for services to the Official Liquidator, prompt payment upon detection, and industry practices. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the penalties were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>