<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>S.68- cash credit – foreign gifts. Judgment popularly referred as case of P.Mohankala deserves a reconsideration in view of facts found by Tribunal which were analyzed in a reasonable manner by High Court.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10824</link>
    <description>The article contends that the Tribunal&#039;s reliance on the preponderance of probabilities to treat foreign gifts as unexplained cash credits was flawed where documentary records, banking channels and donor circumstances supported the genuineness of transfers; the High Court fairly reappraised those facts under principles of the Indian Evidence Act and relevant precedent, and the author urges reconsideration of the reported Supreme Court treatment that consolidated multiple assessees under one name.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:05:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:05:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>S.68- cash credit – foreign gifts. Judgment popularly referred as case of P.Mohankala deserves a reconsideration in view of facts found by Tribunal which were analyzed in a reasonable manner by High Court.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10824</link>
      <description>The article contends that the Tribunal&#039;s reliance on the preponderance of probabilities to treat foreign gifts as unexplained cash credits was flawed where documentary records, banking channels and donor circumstances supported the genuineness of transfers; the High Court fairly reappraised those facts under principles of the Indian Evidence Act and relevant precedent, and the author urges reconsideration of the reported Supreme Court treatment that consolidated multiple assessees under one name.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:05:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>