<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 956 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430532</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal overturned the Order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal directing prosecution under Section 70 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Appellants, ex-directors of the Corporate Debtor, were found to have cooperated fully with the Resolution Professional, except for the non-production of a specific document. The Tribunal ruled that the direction for prosecution was unwarranted as there was no evidence of possession of the document in question. Both Appeals were allowed in favor of the Appellants, setting aside the Order for prosecution under Section 70 of IBC, 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 15:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 956 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430532</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal overturned the Order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal directing prosecution under Section 70 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Appellants, ex-directors of the Corporate Debtor, were found to have cooperated fully with the Resolution Professional, except for the non-production of a specific document. The Tribunal ruled that the direction for prosecution was unwarranted as there was no evidence of possession of the document in question. Both Appeals were allowed in favor of the Appellants, setting aside the Order for prosecution under Section 70 of IBC, 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>