<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 948 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430524</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside demands for including spare parts and lubricants in service value, service tax on trade discounts as commission, and Rule 6(3) demands for periods before 01.04.2011. It upheld compliance with Rule 6(3A) post-01.04.2011 and found penalties on reversed Cenvat credit for steel and cement unjustified. Appeal allowed with consequential reliefs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 09:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 948 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430524</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside demands for including spare parts and lubricants in service value, service tax on trade discounts as commission, and Rule 6(3) demands for periods before 01.04.2011. It upheld compliance with Rule 6(3A) post-01.04.2011 and found penalties on reversed Cenvat credit for steel and cement unjustified. Appeal allowed with consequential reliefs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>