https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30992 The Tribunal confirmed the service tax demand with penalties imposed by the Additional Commissioner. The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside certain charges and penalties, leading to appeals by both parties. The Tribunal questioned a refund issued to the appellant during the appeal process without ensuring tax liability discharge. The appellant's lack of cooperation in quantifying the outstanding demand delayed the decision on pre-deposit/stay. Despite disapproval of the appellant's conduct, the Tribunal deferred the decision to allow compliance. The appeal was adjourned for further quantification and listing with the Department's appeals. The Tribunal directed an investigation into the refund issuance by the CBEC. en-us Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30992 The Tribunal confirmed the service tax demand with penalties imposed by the Additional Commissioner. The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside certain charges and penalties, leading to appeals by both parties. The Tribunal questioned a refund issued to the appellant during the appeal process without ensuring tax liability discharge. The appellant's lack of cooperation in quantifying the outstanding demand delayed the decision on pre-deposit/stay. Despite disapproval of the appellant's conduct, the Tribunal deferred the decision to allow compliance. The appeal was adjourned for further quantification and listing with the Department's appeals. The Tribunal directed an investigation into the refund issuance by the CBEC. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30992