https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305184 The court rejected the accused's petition to quash the proceedings in CC.No.105 of 2013, emphasizing that the defense regarding the stolen cheque could be raised and evaluated during the trial. The court found it inappropriate to halt the proceedings at that stage, noting that the trial had already commenced and the complainant's evidence had been closed. The court held that the truthfulness of the claim could be examined during the trial proceedings, rather than in a summary quash petition. en-us Fri, 01 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:01:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305184 The court rejected the accused's petition to quash the proceedings in CC.No.105 of 2013, emphasizing that the defense regarding the stolen cheque could be raised and evaluated during the trial. The court found it inappropriate to halt the proceedings at that stage, noting that the trial had already commenced and the complainant's evidence had been closed. The court held that the truthfulness of the claim could be examined during the trial proceedings, rather than in a summary quash petition. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305184