<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1348 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI COURT- III</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305198</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed SLB Welfare Association to hand over possession of the real estate project to the Corporate Debtor within two weeks, emphasizing the IRP&#039;s duty under the IBC. It ruled in favor of the IRP in the dispute over ownership and possession rights, stating the project site belonged to the Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal upheld the IBC&#039;s precedence over the RERA Act, directing the handover of the project site to the IRP. Mr. Akarsh Kashyap was appointed as the Authorized Representative of the Financial Creditor, resolving the appointment issue in favor of the majority of home buyers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:01:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1348 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI COURT- III</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305198</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed SLB Welfare Association to hand over possession of the real estate project to the Corporate Debtor within two weeks, emphasizing the IRP&#039;s duty under the IBC. It ruled in favor of the IRP in the dispute over ownership and possession rights, stating the project site belonged to the Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal upheld the IBC&#039;s precedence over the RERA Act, directing the handover of the project site to the IRP. Mr. Akarsh Kashyap was appointed as the Authorized Representative of the Financial Creditor, resolving the appointment issue in favor of the majority of home buyers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>