https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305195 The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition challenging a judgment primarily due to a delay in filing the petition after the conclusion of arguments before the Arbitral Tribunal. The Court emphasized the importance of following statutory provisions and procedures when challenging arbitral decisions. It clarified that interference under Article 227 should only occur in cases demonstrating a patent lack of inherent jurisdiction, cautioning against misusing legal expressions from previous judgments. The Court ordered the petitioner to pay costs and disposed of any pending applications related to the case, expressing disappointment in the High Court's failure to discourage similar litigation. en-us Fri, 18 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:01:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305195 The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition challenging a judgment primarily due to a delay in filing the petition after the conclusion of arguments before the Arbitral Tribunal. The Court emphasized the importance of following statutory provisions and procedures when challenging arbitral decisions. It clarified that interference under Article 227 should only occur in cases demonstrating a patent lack of inherent jurisdiction, cautioning against misusing legal expressions from previous judgments. The Court ordered the petitioner to pay costs and disposed of any pending applications related to the case, expressing disappointment in the High Court's failure to discourage similar litigation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305195