<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 111 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30989</link>
    <description>In a stay application concerning alleged cargo handling service, the tribunal noted that mere transportation of goods falls outside the scope of cargo handling service. As the demand substantially included transportation activity and the applicant had already deposited a part of the disputed amount, the existing deposit was treated as sufficient to hear the appeal. The remaining pre-deposit of service tax and penalty was waived, and stay was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 111 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30989</link>
      <description>In a stay application concerning alleged cargo handling service, the tribunal noted that mere transportation of goods falls outside the scope of cargo handling service. As the demand substantially included transportation activity and the applicant had already deposited a part of the disputed amount, the existing deposit was treated as sufficient to hear the appeal. The remaining pre-deposit of service tax and penalty was waived, and stay was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>