<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (11) TMI 147 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305172</link>
    <description>The court held that the landlord is entitled to recover the enhanced amount of house tax from the tenant under Section 121(1) of the Corporation Act, despite provisions in the Delhi Rent Control Act. The court determined that Section 121(1) prevails over Section 7(2) of the Rent Act as it addresses a specific contingency not covered by the general provision in the Rent Act. The Civil Revision Petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2022 10:49:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (11) TMI 147 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305172</link>
      <description>The court held that the landlord is entitled to recover the enhanced amount of house tax from the tenant under Section 121(1) of the Corporation Act, despite provisions in the Delhi Rent Control Act. The court determined that Section 121(1) prevails over Section 7(2) of the Rent Act as it addresses a specific contingency not covered by the general provision in the Rent Act. The Civil Revision Petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>