<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 939 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430515</link>
    <description>The appeals by the Revenue for both AY 2007-08 and AY 2008-09 were dismissed. The reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were set aside due to the vagueness and insufficiency of the reasons recorded by the AO. The petitions filed by the assessee under Rule 27 of ITAT Rules, 1963, challenging the validity of reassessment proceedings, were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2022 09:54:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 939 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430515</link>
      <description>The appeals by the Revenue for both AY 2007-08 and AY 2008-09 were dismissed. The reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were set aside due to the vagueness and insufficiency of the reasons recorded by the AO. The petitions filed by the assessee under Rule 27 of ITAT Rules, 1963, challenging the validity of reassessment proceedings, were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>