<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Upholds Detention Order Despite Delay Due to Absconding; Delay Satisfactorily Explained Under COFEPOSA.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66664</link>
    <description>Detention of detenue - COFEPOSA - smuggling activity - Delay in passing the order of detention - the delay in the execution of the detention order is satisfactorily explained. Further, it is trite that an absconding detenu cannot cite the delay in the execution of the order to contend that the detention order is liable to be quashed.- HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2022 09:54:15 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2022 09:54:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Upholds Detention Order Despite Delay Due to Absconding; Delay Satisfactorily Explained Under COFEPOSA.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66664</link>
      <description>Detention of detenue - COFEPOSA - smuggling activity - Delay in passing the order of detention - the delay in the execution of the detention order is satisfactorily explained. Further, it is trite that an absconding detenu cannot cite the delay in the execution of the order to contend that the detention order is liable to be quashed.- HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2022 09:54:15 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>