https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430497 The SC allowed the appeal, overturning the HC's judgment. It ruled that the typographical error in the property description did not invalidate the auction, and the delay in depositing the auction amount was justified. The SC emphasized the necessity of exhausting statutory remedies before approaching the HC under Article 226. The surplus auction amount and interest were ordered to be transferred to the borrowers' account. en-us Wed, 16 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430497 The SC allowed the appeal, overturning the HC's judgment. It ruled that the typographical error in the property description did not invalidate the auction, and the delay in depositing the auction amount was justified. The SC emphasized the necessity of exhausting statutory remedies before approaching the HC under Article 226. The surplus auction amount and interest were ordered to be transferred to the borrowers' account. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430497