<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 188 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30984</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals challenging the Commissioner (Appeals) order in the case involving finalization of provisional assessment for Cables supplied to DOT and MTNL. The Tribunal upheld the method of invoice-wise quantification directed by the Commissioner (Appeals) to prevent undue advantage to the appellants. It was emphasized that excess or short payments for each invoice must be separately determined, with no netting off allowed, supporting the Revenue&#039;s position. The legality of the Commissioner (Appeals) order was affirmed, highlighting the necessity of invoice-wise examination for correct assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 188 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30984</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals challenging the Commissioner (Appeals) order in the case involving finalization of provisional assessment for Cables supplied to DOT and MTNL. The Tribunal upheld the method of invoice-wise quantification directed by the Commissioner (Appeals) to prevent undue advantage to the appellants. It was emphasized that excess or short payments for each invoice must be separately determined, with no netting off allowed, supporting the Revenue&#039;s position. The legality of the Commissioner (Appeals) order was affirmed, highlighting the necessity of invoice-wise examination for correct assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>