<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 90 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30983</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Respondents were entitled to a refund of the Central Excise Duty paid for the goods in question. The matter was remanded to the Original Authority for a fresh decision considering the Registration status and excisability of the goods, with the Respondents granted a hearing before the new Order. The Appeal was allowed by way of remand, and the Cross Objection by the Respondents was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 90 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30983</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Respondents were entitled to a refund of the Central Excise Duty paid for the goods in question. The matter was remanded to the Original Authority for a fresh decision considering the Registration status and excisability of the goods, with the Respondents granted a hearing before the new Order. The Appeal was allowed by way of remand, and the Cross Objection by the Respondents was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>