https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305161 The court confirmed the maintainability of writ petitions under Article 227 against arbitral tribunal orders, emphasizing limited interference by High Courts. It highlighted that arbitral tribunals are private and should decide jurisdictional objections promptly. The court upheld the arbitrator's decision to postpone ruling on jurisdictional objections, requiring evidence for a proper decision. The petition was dismissed, directing expedited arbitration with a deadline for the final award. en-us Thu, 25 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Nov 2022 04:45:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305161 The court confirmed the maintainability of writ petitions under Article 227 against arbitral tribunal orders, emphasizing limited interference by High Courts. It highlighted that arbitral tribunals are private and should decide jurisdictional objections promptly. The court upheld the arbitrator's decision to postpone ruling on jurisdictional objections, requiring evidence for a proper decision. The petition was dismissed, directing expedited arbitration with a deadline for the final award. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 25 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305161