https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305160 The court quashed the summoning order in a criminal case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, ruling that the complaint failed to establish the petitioner's liability as required by law. Emphasizing the importance of specific averments under Section 141 of the Act, the court found the complaint lacked essential allegations regarding the petitioner's role in the company at the time of the offense. Consequently, the court deemed the proceedings an abuse of process and ordered their quashing, highlighting the necessity of meeting legal requirements to establish liability in such cases. en-us Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Nov 2022 04:45:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305160 The court quashed the summoning order in a criminal case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, ruling that the complaint failed to establish the petitioner's liability as required by law. Emphasizing the importance of specific averments under Section 141 of the Act, the court found the complaint lacked essential allegations regarding the petitioner's role in the company at the time of the offense. Consequently, the court deemed the proceedings an abuse of process and ordered their quashing, highlighting the necessity of meeting legal requirements to establish liability in such cases. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305160