<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 88 - HIGH COURT PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30981</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner in a mandamus petition, ordering the respondent to refund Rs. 1 crore and return post-dated cheques of Rs. 1.5 crores within one month. The court emphasized that the department could recover any dues in the future. An affidavit was submitted to secure future revenue demands with an industrial plot owned by the petitioner&#039;s son, free from encumbrances. The court directed the respondent to provide copies of relevant seized documents and concluded that its order did not prejudice the rights of either party, ensuring a fair resolution while safeguarding revenue interests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 88 - HIGH COURT PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30981</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner in a mandamus petition, ordering the respondent to refund Rs. 1 crore and return post-dated cheques of Rs. 1.5 crores within one month. The court emphasized that the department could recover any dues in the future. An affidavit was submitted to secure future revenue demands with an industrial plot owned by the petitioner&#039;s son, free from encumbrances. The court directed the respondent to provide copies of relevant seized documents and concluded that its order did not prejudice the rights of either party, ensuring a fair resolution while safeguarding revenue interests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>