https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305156 The court set aside the decree against the sureties (defendants Nos. 2 and 3) and allowed the appeal with costs. It held that the substantial variation in the original contract without the sureties' consent discharged them from liability. The court emphasized that the sureties were not bound by the new contract, as it was single and indivisible. The alleged extension of time and negligence in realizing rent did not impact the sureties' liability. en-us Thu, 17 Sep 1931 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Nov 2022 12:05:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305156 The court set aside the decree against the sureties (defendants Nos. 2 and 3) and allowed the appeal with costs. It held that the substantial variation in the original contract without the sureties' consent discharged them from liability. The court emphasized that the sureties were not bound by the new contract, as it was single and indivisible. The alleged extension of time and negligence in realizing rent did not impact the sureties' liability. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 17 Sep 1931 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305156