<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant Challenges Revenue&#039;s Demand to Use Different CENVAT Credit Reversal Method u/r 6 Options.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66639</link>
    <description>Reversal of proportionate CENVAT Credit - when the appellant have categorically agree for the reversal of Cenvat credit by way of opting for option provided under sub-rule (3)(ii), how Revenue can insist that option (3)(i) under Rule 6 should only be followed by the assessee. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2022 11:42:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2022 11:42:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant Challenges Revenue&#039;s Demand to Use Different CENVAT Credit Reversal Method u/r 6 Options.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66639</link>
      <description>Reversal of proportionate CENVAT Credit - when the appellant have categorically agree for the reversal of Cenvat credit by way of opting for option provided under sub-rule (3)(ii), how Revenue can insist that option (3)(i) under Rule 6 should only be followed by the assessee. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2022 11:42:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>