<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Supreme Court clarifies Section 34 of SARFAESI Act: Compensation claims not barred when tribunals lack jurisdiction.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66635</link>
    <description>Auction of secured property by the Bank - Period of limitation under SARFAESI Act - It is required to be noted that the suit was for damages/compensation, with respect to the balance land, which could not have been decided by the DRT or Appellate Tribunal, Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act shall be applicable only in a case where the Debt Recovery Tribunal and/or Appellate Tribunal is empowered to decide the matter under the SARFAESI Act. The plaintiff was not challenging the sale/sale certificate. The plaintiff claimed the damages/compensation with respect to the less area. Therefore, the High Court has seriously erred in holding that the suit was barred by Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act.- SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2022 11:06:40 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2022 11:06:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court clarifies Section 34 of SARFAESI Act: Compensation claims not barred when tribunals lack jurisdiction.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66635</link>
      <description>Auction of secured property by the Bank - Period of limitation under SARFAESI Act - It is required to be noted that the suit was for damages/compensation, with respect to the balance land, which could not have been decided by the DRT or Appellate Tribunal, Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act shall be applicable only in a case where the Debt Recovery Tribunal and/or Appellate Tribunal is empowered to decide the matter under the SARFAESI Act. The plaintiff was not challenging the sale/sale certificate. The plaintiff claimed the damages/compensation with respect to the less area. Therefore, the High Court has seriously erred in holding that the suit was barred by Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act.- SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2022 11:06:40 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>