<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 899 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430475</link>
    <description>HC rejected the appeal challenging registration cancellation due to significant filing delay. Despite circulars potentially extending timelines, the petitioner failed to utilize available remedies within prescribed periods. The court found no justifiable grounds for delay, emphasizing the importance of timely legal challenges. The writ petition was dismissed, upholding the appellate authority&#039;s decision based on procedural limitations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 17:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 899 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430475</link>
      <description>HC rejected the appeal challenging registration cancellation due to significant filing delay. Despite circulars potentially extending timelines, the petitioner failed to utilize available remedies within prescribed periods. The court found no justifiable grounds for delay, emphasizing the importance of timely legal challenges. The writ petition was dismissed, upholding the appellate authority&#039;s decision based on procedural limitations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>