<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 889 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430465</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the Assessment Year 2015-16. The Tribunal found that the appellant acted in good faith, following guidance notes and past practices, and that there were two possible views on the issues raised, indicating no deliberate inaccurate reporting of income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2022 14:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 889 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430465</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the Assessment Year 2015-16. The Tribunal found that the appellant acted in good faith, following guidance notes and past practices, and that there were two possible views on the issues raised, indicating no deliberate inaccurate reporting of income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>