<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 887 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430463</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for statistical purposes. It remanded the issue of depreciation and insurance expenses back to the CIT(A) for verification, deleted the addition related to the unreconciled creditor balance, and upheld the disallowance for non-deduction of TDS on carting expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2022 09:00:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 887 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430463</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for statistical purposes. It remanded the issue of depreciation and insurance expenses back to the CIT(A) for verification, deleted the addition related to the unreconciled creditor balance, and upheld the disallowance for non-deduction of TDS on carting expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430463</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>