<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 884 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430460</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed for remand to verify the passing on of the service tax burden, emphasizing the importance of the unjust enrichment test in refund cases. The matter was remanded for verification of whether the tax burden was passed on, directing a de novo adjudication within three months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2022 09:00:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 884 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430460</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed for remand to verify the passing on of the service tax burden, emphasizing the importance of the unjust enrichment test in refund cases. The matter was remanded for verification of whether the tax burden was passed on, directing a de novo adjudication within three months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>