<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 883 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430459</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee trust, finding that the Principal Commissioner had exceeded jurisdiction by imposing conditions not specified in the law. The Tribunal clarified that statutory violations would have legal consequences, and the decision did not shield the assessee from potential action by the Revenue for non-compliance. The appeals were granted in line with a Co-ordinate Bench decision, with the order issued on 16/11/2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2022 10:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 883 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430459</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee trust, finding that the Principal Commissioner had exceeded jurisdiction by imposing conditions not specified in the law. The Tribunal clarified that statutory violations would have legal consequences, and the decision did not shield the assessee from potential action by the Revenue for non-compliance. The appeals were granted in line with a Co-ordinate Bench decision, with the order issued on 16/11/2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>