<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 882 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430458</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowance of Rs. 76,22,179 under section 14A. It held that for A.Y. 2014-15, no disallowance could be made under section 14A if no exempt income was earned, rejecting the retrospective application of the amendment by The Finance Act, 2022. The decision emphasized that the said amendment should not have retrospective effect, resulting in the dismissal of the disallowance and favoring the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2022 09:00:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 882 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430458</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowance of Rs. 76,22,179 under section 14A. It held that for A.Y. 2014-15, no disallowance could be made under section 14A if no exempt income was earned, rejecting the retrospective application of the amendment by The Finance Act, 2022. The decision emphasized that the said amendment should not have retrospective effect, resulting in the dismissal of the disallowance and favoring the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>