<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 876 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430452</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the A.O. to delete the addition made on account of alleged accommodation entries from specific trading companies, as the disallowance was not supported by sufficient evidence and was deemed unjustified. The Tribunal found that the A.O. did not provide enough evidence to support the disallowance, relying on surmises and conjectures, ultimately leading to the deletion of the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2022 10:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 876 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430452</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the A.O. to delete the addition made on account of alleged accommodation entries from specific trading companies, as the disallowance was not supported by sufficient evidence and was deemed unjustified. The Tribunal found that the A.O. did not provide enough evidence to support the disallowance, relying on surmises and conjectures, ultimately leading to the deletion of the addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>