<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 871 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430447</link>
    <description>Glucometers were treated as instruments for physical or chemical analysis and classified under heading 9027, not heading 9018, because their essential function was to draw blood and determine glucose levels; the revenue&#039;s contrary classification was rejected. The writ petition was also held maintainable despite an alternate appellate remedy, since the adjudicating authority had ignored an earlier binding Tribunal ruling on identical goods and relegating the assessee to appeal would have been a mere formality. The court therefore applied judicial discipline and stare decisis, and the classification order and consequential demand notices were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2022 13:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 871 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430447</link>
      <description>Glucometers were treated as instruments for physical or chemical analysis and classified under heading 9027, not heading 9018, because their essential function was to draw blood and determine glucose levels; the revenue&#039;s contrary classification was rejected. The writ petition was also held maintainable despite an alternate appellate remedy, since the adjudicating authority had ignored an earlier binding Tribunal ruling on identical goods and relegating the assessee to appeal would have been a mere formality. The court therefore applied judicial discipline and stare decisis, and the classification order and consequential demand notices were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>