<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 862 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430438</link>
    <description>Supply and laying of ready-mix concrete at the buyer&#039;s site was treated as manufacture and sale of goods, with pumping, pouring and laying regarded as incidental to the product; service tax as works contract service was therefore not sustainable. The record also showed that renting of tangible goods turnover remained within the small-scale service provider exemption, so that demand was set aside. The demand on legal services under reverse charge was further held time-barred, and the challenge on limitation succeeded. The overall effect was relief on all contested service tax demands, with the contractual label unable to alter the transaction&#039;s substantive character.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2022 08:59:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 862 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430438</link>
      <description>Supply and laying of ready-mix concrete at the buyer&#039;s site was treated as manufacture and sale of goods, with pumping, pouring and laying regarded as incidental to the product; service tax as works contract service was therefore not sustainable. The record also showed that renting of tangible goods turnover remained within the small-scale service provider exemption, so that demand was set aside. The demand on legal services under reverse charge was further held time-barred, and the challenge on limitation succeeded. The overall effect was relief on all contested service tax demands, with the contractual label unable to alter the transaction&#039;s substantive character.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>