<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 861 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430437</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders demanding specific amounts, emphasizing compliance with Rule 6 provisions. It directed the adjudicating authority to reevaluate and issue a fresh order after providing a reasonable opportunity for hearing to the appellants. The appeals were allowed by way of remand to the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2022 08:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 861 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430437</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders demanding specific amounts, emphasizing compliance with Rule 6 provisions. It directed the adjudicating authority to reevaluate and issue a fresh order after providing a reasonable opportunity for hearing to the appellants. The appeals were allowed by way of remand to the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>