https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430435 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the rejection of the refund claim under the SVLDR Scheme. It held that the interest amount deposited by the appellant was eligible for refund and should have been deducted while calculating the duty liability. The judgment emphasized mandatory deduction of any amount deposited by the appellant and affirmed the entitlement to the refund along with interest, irrespective of the statutory limitation period. en-us Thu, 17 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Nov 2022 08:58:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430435 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the rejection of the refund claim under the SVLDR Scheme. It held that the interest amount deposited by the appellant was eligible for refund and should have been deducted while calculating the duty liability. The judgment emphasized mandatory deduction of any amount deposited by the appellant and affirmed the entitlement to the refund along with interest, irrespective of the statutory limitation period. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 17 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430435