https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430428 Conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act were left undisturbed because the accused admitted ownership and signature of the cheque, led no defence evidence, and the cheque was proved to have been dishonoured for insufficient funds after due notice and service. The statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 operated in favour of the complainant, and the accused failed to rebut them on a preponderance of probabilities. No material irregularity or miscarriage of justice was shown in the concurrent findings, and the limited revisional jurisdiction did not justify re-appreciation of evidence. en-us Thu, 10 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Nov 2022 08:58:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430428 Conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act were left undisturbed because the accused admitted ownership and signature of the cheque, led no defence evidence, and the cheque was proved to have been dishonoured for insufficient funds after due notice and service. The statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 operated in favour of the complainant, and the accused failed to rebut them on a preponderance of probabilities. No material irregularity or miscarriage of justice was shown in the concurrent findings, and the limited revisional jurisdiction did not justify re-appreciation of evidence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 10 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430428