https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305151 Once issuance of the cheques and signatures were admitted, the presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act operated in favour of the cheque holder, and the burden shifted to the accused to raise a probable defence on a preponderance of probabilities. The claim that the cheques were only security cheques was not supported by cogent material, while the complainant's evidence, dishonour memos and legal notice supported liability and dishonour for insufficiency of funds. In revision under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, no legal error, perversity or miscarriage of justice was shown in the concurrent findings, so interference was declined. en-us Tue, 15 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Nov 2022 20:30:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305151 Once issuance of the cheques and signatures were admitted, the presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act operated in favour of the cheque holder, and the burden shifted to the accused to raise a probable defence on a preponderance of probabilities. The claim that the cheques were only security cheques was not supported by cogent material, while the complainant's evidence, dishonour memos and legal notice supported liability and dishonour for insufficiency of funds. In revision under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, no legal error, perversity or miscarriage of justice was shown in the concurrent findings, so interference was declined. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 15 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305151